![]() ![]() ![]() Beautiful! and designed with digital hybrid clearly in mind. Kodak's E100 rebuild of Ektachrome 100 has been an amazing film. I see software for PP as part of the reason I went back to film - for simplicity. Maybe less true now than yeas back, but still. But the comment that resonates with me as an ex-Linux user on the interface is really spot on: Linux (open source) stuff is more often than not aimed at folks who have a heavy software bent, and really really want to design their own user interface. Darktable has a core base of fans who I have nothing but respect for, and I've heard a lot of good things over at Photrio and LargeFormatForum. See now that it's not, and wonder about it's advantages/disadvantages. ![]() That said, I've always been curious about Iridient Developer but back in my FUJI round one days, it was only MAC. Conecolor inks and an Epson printer can save a bundle over the OEM inks! if you can swing it, and printing is important enough to your workflow. CO however remains top notch for color handling IMHO, and decent at printing - though I've used PiezoPro (for B&W) and Imageprint and recommend those even more, too. This still is going to be the key to refining photos you really want, so I've got to get that figured. My interest was really in PS's masking tech because Capture One's didn't work all that well for me (or to rephrase that, my skills in using their mask making - also called "layers" - were primitive. But I haven't gone full rounds with PS either. Very granular and pixel oriented that it is. Using LF 4X5 opened my mind up to Photoshop, but can't say I liked it all that much. ever since my FUJI cameras some years back and CO version 8. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |